In 2016, after Apple removed the memory card slot from MacBook Pros, I complained about this loudly. “Everything is going wireless,” a since-departed executive told me, adding that there was no need for the slot anymore. I tried to explain that there was literally no way to move gigabytes of high-definition video footage or even […]
In 2016, after Apple removed the memory card slot from MacBook Pros, I complained about this loudly. “Everything is going wireless,” a since-departed executive told me, adding that there was no need for the slot anymore.
I tried to explain that there was literally no way to move gigabytes of high-definition video footage or even large numbers of RAW files from a camera to a computer this way — we needed the slot, but he waved me off. My experience was likely not unique, as many professionals also complained and felt as though Apple wasn’t listening.
Sure, consumers have flocked to smartphones for their photography (and many professionals have, too), and yeah, you can send those images to the computer wirelessly — but those are smaller files. For those of us who use cameras with sensors that feaure resultions anywhere from 25 to 50 megapixels or more, we need memory cards and we will for many years to come. And guess what? The “pros” that the Macbook “Pro” is aimed at most certainly use those cameras.
Many of us also complained loudly when Apple, under the guise of making the computers smaller and sleeker, removed most of the other ports that we very much used, even on the so-called “pro” models. The loss of the HDMI was particularly notable.
For those of us in the “pro” camp who have rows of hard drives on our desks, dedicated webcams, microphones, audio mixers, card readers, and an ever-growing list of peripherals we need to connect to our computers in order to do our jobs, it felt like we didn’t exist.
For years it felt like our pleas were going nowhere and were doomed to be unanswered. It got to the point where the 13-inch MacBook Pro that was introduced last year felt like a cruel joke: it had just two USB-C ports, and one of them was needed for charging the machine. While there was certainly power under the hood, the workflows and usability to get to that power felt needlessly complicated and obtuse when put into real-world use.
But in a rare about-face for a company that rarely — if ever — goes back on any decisions, it actually responded to what it was hearing from the photographers and videographers who buy these machines en mass.
The SD card slot, HDMI, and MagSafe are back. Apple has finally put the “pro” back into the line’s name — and it’s about time.
So thank you Apple.
I think an inordinate amount of attention is going to be paid to the “notch” at the top of the display that houses the webcam, and that’s a shame. Apple legitimately added space to the display and is now being meme’d for it. In reality, the notch spends most of its time hidden inside the center of the taskbar in a space that doesn’t get used anyway. When watching movies and videos, those are generally in widescreen format so that area of the screen will be black anyway. Complaining about the notch feels like a tactic by those who already don’t like Apple to find something, anything to point to in order to bring down Apple.
The new processing chips found in the machines, the M1 Pro or M1 Max, Apple says are its most powerful ever, with way more speed than last year’s M1 upgrade, which was the most significant Apple processing upgrade I’ve seen in over 20 years of covering the company. Considering that M1 delivered on what it promised, there is no reason to doubt that these new chips will live up to those now-lofty expectations.
Just as it is absolutely fair to loudly complain when Apple doesn’t do something that for the audience it claims to support, it’s just as important to give the company credit for making the correct decisions. While we didn’t really get an actual apology for the mistakes the company made, we got something far more important: actual change. These new MacBook Pros promise to be exceptionally fast and workflow-efficient machines and Apple deserves kudos for listening to its customers.
Don’t get me wrong: if Apple makes a mistake like it did when it removed all the ports years ago, I’ll be the first to cry foul. But this time, Apple gets a proper round of applause from me.
Finally, now that we have the SD card slot, HDMI, and MagSafe back, can we talk about the return of the headphone jack to the iPhone? Please?
Image credits: All photos courtesy of Apple.
About the author: Jefferson Graham is a Los Angeles area writer/photographer and the host of the travel photography streaming TV series Photowalks. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.
It was the kind of summer day that your mind instantly recalls when you hear the words “summer day”. Warm, sunny, gorgeous. William Meredith’s daughters, as was their habit when a day felt this good, lounging in the backyard, sunning in their swimsuits. All was peaceful — until the girls entered the house, warning their […]
It was the kind of summer day that your mind instantly recalls when you hear the words “summer day”. Warm, sunny, gorgeous. William Meredith’s daughters, as was their habit when a day felt this good, lounging in the backyard, sunning in their swimsuits. All was peaceful — until the girls entered the house, warning their father of an intruder in their backyard.
Meredith grabbed his shotgun and bolted outside. He scanned the surroundings and quickly found his target, now creeping around a neighbor’s yard. Before too long, the snoop turned and headed back William’s way. He waited until the peeping tom had crossed over the property line, and…
All it took was one shot.
But the visitor had not been alone. Four men approached his home from the front. William was ready. As the angry men approached, he issued a warning:
“Cross my sidewalk, there’s gonna be another shooting.”
The men decided to take their frustration to the local authorities. Shortly thereafter, William Meredith was arrested for the murder of… an $1,800 drone that had been flying around his neighborhood.
The owner of the drone, David Boggs, claimed he had simply been flying around taking photographs of a nearby house for a friend. For Mr. Meredith’s part, he viewed the intrusion as tantamount to the home invasion you probably imagined I was describing. It is likely this is not the only such story you have heard over the last several years regarding drones and privacy. But while the technology is new, the argument is anything but.
It has now been well over a century since Joel Benton’s poem “The Kodak Fiend” warned, in ominous verse, “Oh, de Kodak fiend, he’s sly an’ mean / An’ you can’t go out near his machine.”
The democratization of photography has, from its very start, brought with it the risk — as well as the fear — of loss of privacy. The story of how society reacted to this phenomenon is rich and far-reaching, upending social norms and creating wholly new legal precedents. One camera, more than any other even to this day, helped build the world we occupy: The Kodak Brownie.
In the late 19th century, the Eastman Kodak company had been making strides toward — and waves with — more inexpensive, portable camera options. Still out of the reach of many consumers, though, at $25 each (over $700 in today’s dollars), these first attempts found their way into the hands of a very particular class of citizens: reporters. It is no wonder, then, that the first group to sound the loudest alarms over privacy were not the common folk, but rather the well-heeled, upper-class types most likely to generate headlines.
While American society has always been stratified and public personas of the powerful have always been carefully manicured, in the late 19th century the elite enjoyed considerable control over their separation from the rabble. With affordable photography, they found the veil being lifted, a click at a time, and they were not pleased. Gossip merchants and sleuthhounds were now empowered with a vastly more potent tool to shed light upon and wrest away control from their carefully crafted public image.
It is no wonder, then, that the first major treatise on these concerns emerged from one of the nation’s most elite institutions. In 1890, the Harvard Law Review published an article entitled “The Right to Privacy” by Samuel D. Warren and Louis Brandeis. The document became one of the most influential writings in American legal history.
While attributed to both men, the reality is far more telling. Brandeis, a Jewish immigrant and future Supreme Court Justice, handled most of the writing but had been urged toward it by Warren. Warren, the son of a paper mill magnate and a member of the high society so threatened by this accessible technology, was incensed by the intrusion of this proto-paparazzi upon his way of life. The article itself makes the concerns quite plain:
The press is overstepping in every direction the obvious bounds of propriety and of decency. Gossip is no longer the resource of the idle and of the vicious but has become a trade, which is pursued with industry as well as effrontery. To satisfy a prurient taste the details of sexual relations are spread broadcast in the columns of the daily papers. To occupy the indolent, column upon column is filled with idle gossip, which can only be procured by intrusion upon the domestic circle.
These concerns were not relegated to the wealthy for long, however. A decade after the influential article’s publication, the Eastman Kodak company released the first undeniably mass-market camera: The Kodak Brownie. For the price of $1 (equivalent to $32.66 in today’s dollars), anyone could grab a cheap cardboard box with fake leather coating and a meniscus lens and aim it anywhere they pleased.
In our current world, news has exploded with revelations of Instagram’s effect on teenagers, particularly young girls, and how, despite this potential harm, the company was actively designing an alternate version of its app for an even younger audience. It has since been put “on hold” due to public pressure. The power of algorithms and information harvesting is significant, but the Kodak Brownie was doing it all first.
The name “Brownie” itself was more than merely a reference to the camera’s designer, Frank A. Brownell — it was a bit of marketing genius. The cutesy name, accompanied by magical mascots from a popular series of children’s books, existed solely to target Kodak’s affordable camera to children.
“Plant the Brownie acorn and the Kodak oak will grow,” was a popular slogan at the time. It worked like gangbusters. Eastman Kodak shipped more than 1.5 million Brownies in the first year of production. Forget the socialites outside their fancy soirees, the Brownie is when schoolyard had become a photo studio. At every level of American life, privacy had changed.
The explosion of images was inextricably linked to an explosion of intrusions, new and strange to the culture. The public could not get enough of the Brownie, and their sense of propriety began to relax in order to accommodate their new fascination. Your average citizen could now capture moments of extreme humanity, poverty, embarrassment, and harm that had been unthinkable before. The common person was now also beginning to wonder, what were the new rules? The law was going to have to catch up with the times, and the very same year the Brownie was introduced, it would face its first test.
Abigail Robertson was a teenager from Rochester, New York who had sat for a portrait at a local studio. This was, by now, a common enough practice. What was uncommon, however, is what Abigail saw in shop windows some time after her photograph was taken. All over the town of Rochester and well beyond, Abigail’s face graced poster after poster, advertising the flour of a nearby mill. Without her knowledge, with no agreement on her part, Abigail had become the mascot for a product, and in storefronts, warehouses, and even saloons, acquaintances saw and recognized her daily. All in all, 25,000 such posters were produced and distributed.
For Abigail, this was horrific. The embarrassment and confusion she experienced led her to severe nervous shock, leaving her bedridden and attended to by a physician. This was simply not something a person of this time period was prepared to handle.
Abigail sued Franklin Mills, the flour mill for which the advertisements were produced, and the Rochester Folding-Box Company, which were responsible for the production of the posters, for $15,000 in damages (nearly half a million dollars in today’s currency) and an order forbidding her likeness being used in any advertisement.
At the first trial, in the Supreme Court of Monroe County, the defendants’ argument was simple: They had the right to use Abigail’s photograph because there was no law saying they did not have such a right. The judge was unmoved. Interestingly, his reasoning hinged a great deal on Abigail’s station in life as an everyday citizen. In good conscience, he could not rule that a normal person should be placed in such a position, as they had invited no attention on themselves and had sought no celebrity. He concluded that such use of Roberson’s likeness without consent was not only plainly traumatic, but the very act of selecting her image for advertisement indicated it possessed value, and the right to such value belonged to Robertson herself.
Franklin Mills and the Rochester Folding-Box Company appealed, unwilling to cede payment and stop the use of their popular advertising campaign. The case finally traveled all the way to the State of New York Court of Appeals. There, over a decade after its publication, Warren and Brandeis’s “Right to Privacy” was invoked repeatedly by Abigail’s lawyers.
Shockingly, it did little good. By a four to three decision, Robertson’s victory was overturned. The Court of Appeals ruled that Abigail’s face had no inherent value whatsoever, was not physical property, thus nothing had been stolen from her. Additionally, Chief Judge Alton Parker concluded “right of privacy” had no firm basis in present jurisprudence. It was a devastating conclusion, made more bitter by the court’s dismissal of Abigail’s suffering as “purely mental,” and Chief Judge Parker’s demeaning comments to the young woman about how she should be “flattered” someone found her so beautiful.
Unsurprisingly, Abigail’s case had become immensely popular with the public, touching on concerns shared by many Americans at the time. To see her defeated in this way infuriated the public. The country was long past the self-pitying complaints of the bourgeoisie over gossip rags. This was about the common folk. If they could do this to this innocent girl, who was next? The outcry was so immediate and intense that the New York State Legislature was compelled to act.
In 1903, New York became the first state to recognize a right to control the use of one’s name and image. Though limited in scope, it did criminalize the non-consensual use of one’s image for advertisement and trade. Others who had experienced invasions of privacy like Abigail’s were empowered to file a civil suit to cease further use of their likenesses and be compensated. Other states followed. Warren and Brandeis’s “The Right to Privacy” was used in over a dozen cases to bring about the recognition of the common law right of privacy.
Within a few years, a manual on the law of advertising was already recommending written and signed releases from models. By 1909, the issue found its way to the Supreme Court, where a woman successfully won, arguing that a photograph of her used in a whiskey advertisement constituted libel. Mrs. A. Schuman argued reputational harm in being associated with such a product when she was quite proudly a woman of impeccable sobriety. In this new era of the snapshot, the new rules were quickly coming into focus.
Brandeis, for his part, was not done with the topic. His passion for privacy rights followed him all the way to the Supreme Court, wherein in 1928, he wrote a thunderous, historic dissent in Olmstead v. United States, arguing evidence obtained by wiretap violated the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Though he lost at the time, some four decades later, the court would overturn the ruling and finally agree with his position.
The right to privacy became a core consideration for Americans. Increasingly, this right found itself at the center of a variety of issues. In the 1960s, it was invoked to protect the right of married couples to purchase contraception, which set the stage for one of the most consequential victories for privacy in our nation’s history, Roe v. Wade.
Every year that passes, we encounter new, frightening ways in which our privacy is intruded upon. Terms of Service for virtually any transaction, purchase, or online membership have become an inscrutable rats’ nest meant to overwhelm the average citizen to the point of ceding their rights without even knowing to what degree they have done so. Facebook and Instagram are probably, collectively, the largest photo album in the history of the medium. There have long been concerns, some well-founded, that the images we are sharing online will show up in an advertisement, or as part of some corporation’s “content.”
Even as recently as last year, the social media giant began updating its rights management systems, working with certain, undisclosed partners to grant them the power to claim ownership of their images and dictate when and where those images show up across the platform. How will this impact you in the future? This remains unclear.
What is undeniable, however, is the shift to accessible photography — pioneered by Eastman Kodak and brought to new heights over a century ago with their cheap little Brownie — started a conversation in the country that has since spilled into every aspect of public life.
Sources: Wikipedia, WireWheel, The Chronicle, Timeline.
Image credits: Header image made of photos licensed via Depositphotos.
See that tiny blob of light, circled in red? Doesn’t look like much, does it? But that blob represents a feast big enough to feed a black hole around 30 million times the mass of our Sun! Scientists call these kinds of stellar meals tidal disruption events, and they’re some of the most dramatic happenings in the cosmos.Sometimes, an unlucky star strays too close to a black hole. The black hole’s gravity pulls on the star, causing it...
The Prime Minister has confirmed Australia will receive a state-of-the-art, purpose-built quarantine facility to deal with the new Omicron variant, expected to be in place around thirty-five years after the variant ceases to exist. Mr Morrison said he had ordered a three-year review into the feasibility of the facility, after which he would sign a deal with France to build it, before secretly organising a separate deal with the United States. “There’s still a bit of planning to do, and one or two international relationships to burn before we get everything up and running, so 2060 is an indicative date. But of course it could be longer than that, pending future negotiations,” he said. The PM said the new quarantine facility would provide certainty for Australian...
Older aircraft almost always end up with niche airlines or otherwise smaller operators, or with those from less talked about countries. The A310 is no exception. With ten active passenger aircraft, all are used by operators from Iran and Afghanistan. YA-CAV is the sole active non-Iranian passenger A310. Photo: Dmitry Terekhov via Flickr.Only ten active passenger A310s left Just ten active passenger A310s remain, ch-aviation.com indicates. All but one is with an Iranian operator, resulting from severe sanctions that impede any meaningful development for airlines in the country. It’s the same with the A300,...
The Welsh government is to pump in more cash to help end homelessness in the country including a new £30 million funding pot for local authorities, housing minister Julie James (pictured, above) has announced. It will be used primarily to support the , which effectively underwrites the risks and costs of persuading private landlords to rent their properties to local authorities in return for a rent guarantee and additional funding to improve the condition of their property. Local authorities can then use these properties to provide affordable and good quality homes for people who are at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Tenants will benefit from the security of long-term tenures of between five to 20 years and help to maintain their stay in a long-term home, such...
Kaizer Chiefs‘ pursuit of a TOP France-based midfielder has received a boost with reports claiming the targeted player will consider the move. READ | MAMELODI SUNDOWNS | RHULANI DELIVERS NOT-SO-GOOD NEWS ON STAR PLAYER Bongani Zungu is the player Amakhosi are reported to be keen on following the latest developments in France with Amiens. According to Soccer Laduma, Zungu has clubs in Turkey, Spain, Asia and USA keeping an eye on him, and while he would like to continue playing abroad, him coming back to South Africa cannot be ruled out completely. READ | KAIZER CHIEFS TO RIVAL MAMELODI SUNDOWNS FOR TOP PSL PRIZE! Now that’s where Kaizer Chiefs enter; the Glamour Boys were heavily...
There’s only one month left in 2021, which is pretty hard to believe. But that means we’ve been reflecting on the year in fashion and all of the shopping buys that were truly worth it. Curious to find out some of the top-recommended picks from 2021, I asked Who What Wear editors to share their best Nordstrom shopping finds of the year.So what made the cut? Ahead, we’re sharing everything from affordable basics that we wear again and again to cool, trend-forward finds to designer investment pieces that were worth every penny plus beauty staples that have earned the fashion-editor stamp of approval. Though there have been plenty of items that landed in our carts, these are the 29 best Nordstrom shopping pieces our...
Astrology by WITCH TIPS Happy Samhain, Halloween, and Dia de los Muertos!Venus, who’s in Sagittarius, harmonizes with Jupiter, who’s in Aquarius, on October 28 and brings our tender sentiments to the surface of our consciousness. Mars enters Scorpio on October 30, allowing us to take action and make decisions on an intuitive level. The Scorpio Sun and Saturn, who’s in Aquarius, square off on October 30. This will have an intense effect on our confidence. Be gentle with yourselves and others on the 30th! Mercury connects with Jupiter on November 1, then shares a fraught aspect with Pluto, who’s in Capricorn (the third time these planets squared off this season, the other...
November 11, 2021, a rally formed outside of Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia (BC). The group was there to call attention to an unthinkable tragedy: 13 babies were reportedly stillborn at the hospital in a period of 24 hours. All of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection.1 In a typical month, there may be one stillborn baby at the hospital, one of the protestors said, making the 13 stillbirths highly unusual. The only reason the deaths came to light was because several doulas came forward, detailing the events. Vancouver Coastal Health has disputed the reports of stillbirths at Lions Gate Hospital, stating, “There is no truth to this claim … There has been no notable change to the incidence of stillbirths...