EU backs Moldova with €60M amid Putin’s gas squeeze

Ukraine is also stepping in to help Moldova in its state of emergency.

EU backs Moldova with €60M amid Putin’s gas squeeze

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday she was providing Moldova with €60 million to help the country’s pro-EU administration buy natural gas amid a supply dispute with Moscow.

That’s hardly enough to help the country plug the gap after negotiations with Russian giant Gazprom turned sour. But more may be in the pipeline if needed.

It’s not unusual for Russia to exert pressure on neighbors through gas supplies, and these strong-arm tactics were the subject of a major EU antitrust enquiry between 2012 and 2018. In a sign that Moscow is willing to play hardball, Russia gained notoriety for slashing gas flows to Ukraine in 2009 and 2014. Historically, Moscow has also put pressure on Moldova’s attempts at a westward political trajectory by banning its critical wine exports to Russia.

At last week’s European Council meeting, von der Leyen gave EU leaders an account of what she heard from Moldovan Prime Minister Natalia Gavriliţa: When the country’s gas supply contract was expiring and up for renegotiation, Gazprom proposed either a formidable price hike, or a longer-term contract with political strings attached, which Chișinău found unpalatable.

A Commission official said the €60 million would be a grant rather than a loan and that further financing could be released, but declined to provide details.

Gazprom did not respond to a request for comment.

Moldova is now in a state of emergency, with households and businesses being asked to ration gas use. Moldovagaz, Gazprom’s unit in the country, described the situation as “close to critical” due to dangerously low levels of gas in the system.

On Wednesday, Ukraine’s pipeline operator GTSOU sent over 15 million cubic meters (mmcm) of gas to help its Moldovan counterpart maintain the minimum pressure required in its pipelines. It added that while Moldova had previously only ever ordered Russian gas, Ukraine’s extensive network had more than enough room to transport gas purchased from other suppliers and being held in Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia or Romania.

“In Ukraine, we are all too familiar with the pressure tactics that can only be described as weaponization of energy and unconcealed blackmail. So when we learned that Moldova had to declare a state of emergency, the GTSOU didn’t hesitate to offer help in the spirit of solidarity,” GTSOU Chief Executive Sergiy Makogon told POLITICO. “Recognizing the new reality where Moldova is looking to diversify supplies, as Ukraine had to do back in 2015, GTSOU is offering a stable route of gas supply. These options are sufficient to cover Moldovan demand fully, and GTSOU stands ready to transport it on a firm basis.”

Moldovan central utility Energocom also launched tenders this week for 5 million cubic meters of gas to help meet daily consumption needs — so far, the Dutch company Vitol, Poland’s PGNiG and the Ukrainian-American supplier ERU Group have won bids.

A stopgap agreement with Gazprom is set to expire at the end of the month, but Moldovagaz warned on October 6 that Russian flows were already below what was needed to power and heat the country.

While Moldova’s deputy prime minister was dispatched to St. Petersburg on Wednesday to try again with Gazprom Chief Executive Alexei Miller, Gavrilița was in Brussels, hoping to deepen ties with the EU and win help.

The Commission’s €60 million is enough to pay for about a week’s worth of Moldovan gas consumption at current rates, experts estimated. The country is currently using between 7 mmcm and 8 mmcm of gas each day, which is expected to rise to between 12 mmcm and 15 mmcm as winter approaches.

The Ukrainian government has agreed to supply additional volumes to Moldova, but details of a framework agreement via state-owned Naftogaz have not yet been published.

Sergiu Tofilat, the former adviser for energy issues to Moldovan President Maia Sandu, said the gas required by the country’s 2.6 million consumers each year is “within the margin of error” compared to neighbors in Ukraine and the EU.

“It would be simple for Moldova to buy gas from these partners to see us through the winter even at current market prices, provided we receive some €600 million in aid money,” Tofilat added.

“We want to have a negotiation with Gazprom, but the agreement should be favorable to our citizens,” a person briefed on the negotiations from the Moldovan side said. “This government will never yield to political interference in our relationship with the EU.”

Source : Politico EU More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

Iran set to return to nuclear talks in November

Announcement comes after US warned efforts to revive deal were in 'critical phase.'

Iran set to return to nuclear talks in November

VIENNA — Iran is ready to return to nuclear talks in Vienna before the end of November, Ali Bagheri Kani, the country’s deputy foreign minister, said on Wednesday after meeting with EU officials in Brussels.

“Had a very serious & constructive dialogue with @enriquemora_ on the essential elements for successful negotiations,” he wrote on Twitter, referring to Enrique Mora, the chief EU coordinator for the talks. “We agree to start negotiations before the end of November. Exact date would be announced in the course of the next week,” he added. 

Mora did not immediately confirm the statement but two Western diplomatic officials said Bagheri Kani’s announcement was correct.

The development paves the way for a resumption of talks between Iran and six world powers aimed at reviving the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the Iran nuclear deal is officially called. Negotiations have been stalled since June, when Iran elected hardline cleric Ebrahim Raisi to the presidency.

Iran had repeatedly stressed that it was ready to resume talks “soon” but refused to provide a clear date, leaving U.S. and European officials increasingly impatient and irritated.

“We could understand some hiatus to their transition … but at this point, it’s hard to find an explanation, an innocent explanation, for why they are taking so long,” U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley told reporters in a press call earlier this week. He added that efforts to revive the accord were in a “critical phase.”

The uncertainty led to talk about a “Plan B” — what to do in case Iran does not come back to the table, given the fast acceleration of Tehran’s nuclear program and its acquisition of scientific knowledge about uranium enrichment that experts believe is irreversible.

In a research note on Wednesday, political risk consultancy Eurasia Group said that despite Iran’s readiness to resume talks in November, “a revival of the Iran nuclear agreement is unlikely next year, as Iran’s rapid nuclear buildup and maximalist demands will probably render irrelevant the 2015 agreement.”

It added that “the chances of reaching a compromise are very limited given the Iranian government’s hardline stances and internal divisions, as well as greater demands from the West for new restrictions in response to Iran’s nuclear progress.”

On this point, Malley said that all of the interlocutors he had met in recent weeks, “shared deep and growing concern about the pace and direction of Iran’s nuclear progress, particularly at a time when the U.S. has made clear that it is prepared to come back into compliance with the JCPOA.”

Iran, for its part, continues to insist that its nuclear program is peaceful and that it has no intention of building an atomic weapon.

Comments by Iran’s Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian on Wednesday further dampened expectations of an easy return to the nuclear agreement. He indicated that Tehran may not be prepared to pick up the talks from where they left off in June and repeated an Iranian demand for the release of its frozen assets in foreign banks worth billions of dollars.

The pessimism is a change in tone from earlier this year, when European powers, Russia, China and the EU all mediated indirect talks between Iran and the U.S. during six rounds of discussions in Vienna. Both sides made progress on a step-by-step plan that envisaged Iran reducing its nuclear program in return for U.S. sanctions relief.

A resumption of talks in November could coincide with a planned meeting of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the U.N. nuclear watchdog in charge of monitoring Iran’s nuclear sites. The 35-member board has to decide whether to censure Tehran over its continued refusal to allow IAEA inspectors into certain nuclear sites in Iran. Iran may calculate that a return to talks in Vienna could forestall such a resolution.

Most recently, Iran turned away inspectors at the end of September despite an agreement between Tehran and IAEA Director-General Raphael Grossi over accessing its sites. The inspectors were trying to replace surveillance equipment at the Karaj centrifuge assembly facility that was the target of an alleged sabotage incident in June.

To date, it is still unclear whether IAEA inspectors have managed to access the Karaj site.

Source : Politico EU More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.