Greens and far-right AfD excluded from election ticket in two German states

Greens excluded in the state of Saarland, while the AfD was disqualified in Bremen — both due to nomination irregularities.

Greens and far-right AfD excluded from election ticket in two German states

The German Greens faced a major setback Friday when they were excluded from the ticket in Saarland for September’s German election, while the far-right Alternative for Germany(AfD) was hit with a similar exclusion in Bremen.

The disqualifications — which election committees said were down to irregularities in the candidate nomination process — are not yet definitive, and both parties said they would appeal the decisions, German media reported.

Although Saarland, which has 0.7 million eligible voters, and Bremen, which has 0.5 million, account for just a small amount of the 60.4 million eligible voters in Germany, the exclusion of the parties risks affecting the outcome of the election on September 26. Disqualification, albeit only at the regional level, is also embarrassing for both parties.

In Saarland, the expulsion of the Greens followed an internal fight over the nomination of the regional lead candidate. In a controversial last-minute move, the party switched its lead candidate from Hubert Ulrich to Jeanne Dillschneider. Several party members complained about irregularities in the nomination process, and regional election administrator Monika Zöllner said Friday that the Greens had committed a “severe electoral error,” according to public broadcaster Saarländischer Rundfunk.

In Bremen, the regional election committee said the AfD had failed to provide a sworn declaration that it had complied with electoral law, according to the election oversight blog Wahlrecht.

GERMANY NATIONAL PARLIAMENT ELECTION POLL OF POLLS



For more polling data from across Europe visit Poll of Polls.

Source : Politico EU More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

With Amazon fine, Luxembourg emerges as Europe’s unlikely privacy champion

Luxembourg's €746 million fine is by far the highest under Europe's data protection rules.

With Amazon fine, Luxembourg emerges as Europe’s unlikely privacy champion

Move over, Dublin. It’s Luxembourg that’s kicking off Europe’s era of big-ticket privacy enforcement.

More than three years since the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation came online, the hefty fines it promised are finally materializing.

In financial filings out Friday, tech giant Amazon said the Grand Duchy had fined it a record €746 million after finding that the way the e-commerce giant handles people’s personal information falls afoul of Europe’s strict privacy code.

The figure is the highest ever levied under the code, way ahead of France’s €50 million penalty for Google, the second-highest, and sees Luxembourg emerge as Europe’s unlikely new privacy sheriff.

The tiny, tax-light country has long been accused of being soft on the corporations that make it their home. In light of a POLITICO investigation in February that revealed evidence of data protection lapses at Amazon, an official at the regulator maintained that big penalties were not the way to go. Viviane Reding, an opposition MP in the country and a former EU commissioner who was chief architect of the GDPR, had raised questions about the way the regulator handles privacy complaints, while the clamor of voices criticizing the watchdog grew.

But the record sum for a U.S. heavyweight has thrust Luxembourg to the front line of Europe’s war on Big Tech. In doing so, it asks tough questions of Ireland, which regulates the lion’s share of Silicon Valley companies. So far, Dublin has mustered just a single fine against their ranks: a €450,000 penalty for Twitter.

“This historic sanction highlights even more the complete abdication of the Irish data protection authority which, in three years, has not been able to wrap up any of the other four complaints we have brought against Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and Google,” said French NGO La Quadrature du Net, whose complaint led to Luxembourg’s Amazon fine.

With the mega fine, Luxembourg could even supplant France as Europe’s toughest privacy enforcer. “The exemplary posture of the Luxembourg authority is also a cold shower for the CNIL [France’s data enforcer] in France which, for a long time, was a leader in Europe for data protection. Today, the CNIL is no more than a shadow of itself,” the French NGO added.

Luxembourg also seems to have dodged much of the bureaucratic wrangling that has thwarted Europe’s privacy enforcers against Big Tech.

The Twitter penalty, for instance, only materialized after Ireland was forced to trigger a formal mechanism to resolve disputes between Europe’s regulators, some of whom complained that the figure proposed by the Irish was too low. Ireland’s second Big Tech decision — a possible €50 million fine for WhatsApp — is embroiled in a similar tussle.

Luxembourg’s Amazon fine, however, faced a much smoother ride.

Luxembourg’s initial proposal, reported at around €360 million, was far lower than the figure eventually meted out, but it still managed to finalize the decision without resorting to formal dispute resolution mechanisms.

Luxembourg’s relatively smooth process throws doubt on Ireland’s claims that it is the European enforcement mechanism — known as the one-stop-shop — rather than its own actions that result in enforcement bottlenecks.

But Ireland’s caution may have its benefits.

Amazon has already said it intends to defend itself against Luxembourg’s decision “vigorously,” and said Luxembourg’s fine was predicated on “subjective and untested interpretations of European privacy law,” that are “entirely out of proportion.”

Company lawyers will already be sharpening legal arguments to pick holes in the regulator’s reasoning and may fancy their chances in a legal system that leans in favor of corporate interests.

If Amazon does manage to claw back the fine, it wouldn’t be the first embarrassing setback suffered by Europe’s GDPR enforcers.

Britain’s data protection regulator had two three-figure fines for British Airways and Marriott slashed by 80 percent after the companies fought against it, while Germany’s courts have cut down multi-million euro fines issued by the country’s privacy watchdogs.

Given the fine’s size and the target being none another than Amazon, a similar setback for Luxembourg would be a much more bitter pill to swallow.

Source : Politico EU More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.