Houses Passes PPP Loan Forgiveness Bill, Treasury Issues Harsh Forgiveness Regulations—What You Need to Know

The new regulations provide more complicated requirements for small business owners to apply for and receive PPP loan forgiveness. The post Houses Passes PPP Loan Forgiveness Bill, Treasury Issues Harsh Forgiveness Regulations—What You Need to Know appeared first on AllBusiness.com. Click for more information about Neil Hare. Copyright 2020 by AllBusiness.com. All rights reserved. The content and images contained in this RSS feed may only be used through an RSS reader and may not be reproduced on another website without the express written permission of the owner of AllBusiness.com.

Houses Passes PPP Loan Forgiveness Bill, Treasury Issues Harsh Forgiveness Regulations—What You Need to Know

On May 27, 2020, the House passed the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act by 417-1, which attempts to ease restrictions on small businesses as they seek loan forgiveness under the Paycheck Protection Program authorized by the CARES Act.

The House bill comes on the heels of new Treasury Department “Interim Final Rules” on PPP loans issued late on May 22, right before Memorial Day weekend. These new regulations provided more complicated and harsher requirements for small business owners to apply for and receive PPP loan forgiveness.

Starting with the good news, the House bill addresses many of the concerns expressed by small business since the passing of the CARES Act, which created the PPP. First and foremost, it reduces the amount of the loan needed to be spent on payroll from 75% to 60%, thus increasing the amount of funds available for other expenses from 25% to 40%. These expenses still include rent, mortgage payments, utilities, and interest on loans. This change is less than the 50-50 level most small business advocates were seeking, but it is still an improvement.

The plan outlined in the bill would also offer the following:

  • Extend the window businesses have to use the funds from eight weeks to 24 weeks
  • Push back a June 30 deadline to rehire workers to December 31, 2020
  • Provide more leeway on loan forgiveness for business owners who show they could not rehire workers or reopen due to safety standards
  • Extend the time recipients have to repay the loan
  • Let companies that get loan forgiveness defer payroll taxes

These changes address the “original sin” of the PPP loans: namely, putting small business owners in the position of the unemployment office and forcing them to do so during the government-mandated shutdown, when revenue was close to zero but expenses like rent continued unabated.

On the Senate side, Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) endorsed the House bill and wants to push it forward. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), Chairman of the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, is supporting a different bill, however, but there are enough similarities to give hope for a compromise bill. Specifically, Rubio’s approach would only extend the rehiring deadline to 16 weeks instead of 24. He also opposes the House bill’s easing on forgiveness without rehiring workers.

Treasury Guidelines Crack Down on Forgiveness

While there is optimism in Washington that this new bill will reach President Trump’s desk for signature, there is no guarantee of when or if this may happen. And, until that occurs, the new and harsher Treasury regulations issued on May 22 will dictate how the PPP loan forgiveness process works.

The biggest problem with the new regulations is that you will likely need a lawyer, accountant, and advanced degree in mathematics to figure out how to calculate the forgivable portion of the loan. The government once again did not realize the administrative burden these rules place on business owners at a time when they’re trying to figure out how to survive the coronavirus shutdown and cautious reopening of our economy.

Other Articles From AllBusiness.com:

  • New Treasury Guidance Provides Safe Harbor for PPP Loans
  • Small Business Relief: COVID-19 Resources for Startups
  • Financial Help for Freelancers and Independent Contractors Affected by the Coronavirus Crisis
  • What Advice Are Venture Capitalists Giving to Startups in Light of the Coronavirus?
  • 5 Ways to Improve Employee Communication During the COVID-19 Crisis

Even more surprising, the new rules seem to fly in the face of the intent of the PPP, which was to get money to small businesses as fast as possible to keep the economy afloat, with the assurance that most loans would be forgiven. These new rules will leave many business owners in debt and banks holding short term 1% interest loans—something that neither wanted.

Here are the top things you need to know about the new rules:

1. The SBA can review any loan at any time

The May 13 Treasury FAQs provided a “safe harbor” for all loans under $2 million, deeming them made in “good faith” and that the economic uncertainty faced by the borrower necessitated the loan. However, it did leave the door open to the possibility that the SBA could review all loans to determine eligibility and accurate calculations for the loan amount and forgiveness.

The new regulation elaborates on this as follows:

For a PPP loan of any size, SBA may undertake a review at any time in SBA’s discretion. For example, SBA may review a loan if the loan documentation submitted to SBA by the lender or any other information indicates that the borrower may be ineligible for a PPP loan, or may be ineligible to receive the loan amount or loan forgiveness amount claimed by the borrower. 13 CFR 120.524(c).

Once again, eligibility refers to access to “credit elsewhere,” or the “liquidity” of the borrower. So, under these rules, the SBA could review your loan and determine you had credit elsewhere or other funds, and require you to pay back the loan in full or in part. Banks lose out on this one too, as the SBA can withhold the bank fee or “claw” it back if they make this determination. The SBA will still guarantee these loans, however.

Many business groups, including the Independent Community Bankers Association (ICBA), are lobbying aggressively for a true “safe harbor,” for which loans under $1 million will be considered eligible, not reviewable, and forgiven. The overwhelming majority of PPP loans are under $1 million. Even without this, audits of this nature will likely be rare as the SBA lacks the capacity to conduct a large number of them. However, if your loan is over $2 million and you had sufficient liquidity or credit elsewhere, you may consider repaying the loan or be prepared for an audit.

2. The loan forgiveness process could take up to 5 months

Once you file the forgiveness application with your bank, it will have 60 days to review it and let you know the amount of forgiveness. The bank will then notify the SBA of the amount of forgiveness and the SBA will have 90 days to approve the bank’s decision.

The SBA can request more information from the lender or the borrower directly and then will approve the amount in whole or in part. If the SBA determines a portion or all of the loan did not meet the guidelines for eligibility or forgiveness, it can request repayment of the loan or “pursue other available remedies.” The guidelines do not explain what these other remedies might be. Borrowers do have the right to appeal decisions rejecting forgiveness to the SBA.

It is important to note the SBA now requires borrowers to keep all files and paperwork on PPP loans for six years. The regulation states:

As noted on the Loan Forgiveness Application Form, the borrower must retain PPP documentation in its files for six years after the date the loan is forgiven or repaid in full, and permit authorized representatives of SBA, including representatives of its Office of Inspector General, to access such files upon request from the time of application.

While not expressly stated, presumably the SBA may have six years to audit loans and potentially take action.

3. The borrower is responsible for forgiveness calculation

The guidelines make clear that the borrower is responsible for calculating the forgiveness amount and providing the necessary documentation along with the forgiveness application released on May 15. It is then the lender’s responsibility to make a “good faith” review of the application. The guidelines articulate that a “good faith” review would include checking a payroll report from a third-party provider, or, in lieu of that, cancelled checks, lease agreements, and utilities bills.

4. Employees must be rehired by June 30, 2020

The rehire date did not change from June 30 in these new regulations, but they did clarify a few items. First, if an employee was fired for cause, voluntarily resigned, or voluntarily requested reduced hours due to the coronavirus, the borrower can still request forgiveness for the amount of payroll for that employee. It is critical to document this scenario in writing to provide to your lender with the forgiveness application. Likewise, as before, if an employee rejects an offer for rehire, the correspondence must be documented in writing for forgiveness.

5. Loan forgiveness tied to maintaining the same number of full-time employees

Your amount of forgiveness is tied to having the same number of full-time employees as you did when calculating the loan amount. Thus, your forgiveness amount will be reduced by the same percentage of the reduction of your full-time employees or full-time equivalents.

So, break out your calculators for this one. Traditional SBA loans consider 32 hours per week as a full-time employee. Under PPP, a full-time-equivalent employee must work 40 hours per week. The new guidelines give you two ways to calculate the amount of forgiveness for employees working less than 40 hours per week: If a 40-hour-per-week employee equals 1, you can just calculate all part-time employees as 0.5 or, alternatively, divide the actual number of hours worked by 40. So, for example, an employee working 30 hours would count as 0.75. You will need to add up these part-time employees to determine by what percentage your workforce was reduced, and be prepared to have your loan forgiveness amount reduced accordingly.

6. Loan forgiveness tied to maintaining the same wages per employee

Any amount of wages reduced in excess of 25% per employee will not be forgiven. The new Treasury guidelines also provide that if an employee earns less than $100,000, you can offset wage reductions with hazard pay and bonuses that are eligible for forgiveness. While this is fairly straightforward, the new guidelines clarifiy that the wage reduction “applies only to the portion of the decline in employee salary and wages that is not attributable to the FTE reduction.” This rule, a rare positive in this round of guidance, is intended to avoid double harming borrowers for both wage and head count reduction.

7. Owner employees and the self-employed payroll forgiveness capped at $15,385

There seems no rhyme or reason for this rule. The maximum loan amount for a self-employed individual would be based on $100,000 annual compensation, the limit for all employees covered by PPP. $100,000 divided by 12 months and multiplied by 2.5 as provided in the application process results in a loan amount of $20,833. This arbitrary cap will create roughly a $5,000 difference. Many self-employed individuals work from home or have minimal expenses to make up this gap, likely leaving many with a portion of the loan unforgiven.

In addition, many self-employed workers based their loan amount on a draft Schedule C form as they had not filed their 2019 taxes. If you fall into this category, it is important to ensure that when you actually file your 2019 taxes, there is not a large discrepancy from the draft you provided your lender for the PPP loan. This may cause scrutiny from the SBA.

Conclusion

Once again, many advocacy groups like the ICBA expressed dismay over these regulations to both Congress and the Trump Administration. The House bill could fix many of the problems created by these new regulations and the unfavorable and unfair result of new debt for struggling businesses; short-term, low-interest, and potentially “bad” loans held by banks; and the administrative burden on business owners an SBA audit would demand. Not to mention, there is still tremendous economic uncertainty as the U.S. economy cautiously reopens. It would be in the best interests of our economy to make the PPP forgiveness process as simple and seamless as possible for the small business community.

RELATED:

The post Houses Passes PPP Loan Forgiveness Bill, Treasury Issues Harsh Forgiveness Regulations—What You Need to Know appeared first on AllBusiness.com. Click for more information about Neil Hare. Copyright 2020 by AllBusiness.com. All rights reserved. The content and images contained in this RSS feed may only be used through an RSS reader and may not be reproduced on another website without the express written permission of the owner of AllBusiness.com.

Source : All Business More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

The New Startup: Legal Financing & Lawsuit Loans

While lawsuit loans are a risky investment, the industry is full of successful startups with millions of dollars in available funding. The post The New Startup: Legal Financing & Lawsuit Loans appeared first on Young Upstarts.

The New Startup: Legal Financing & Lawsuit Loans

If you haven’t heard about legal financing or lawsuit loans before, that may change. The practice of legal financing dates back to the early 1990s, but it didn’t take off in the United States until Credit Suisse Securities launched a litigation lending program in 2006 that later .

Legal financing, often referred to as a lawsuit loan, is a cash advance that a lender gives to someone in exchange for a portion of their potential settlement or judgment in a lawsuit. In short, legal finance lenders bet on lawsuits that they think will win. 

While lawsuit loans are a risky investment, the industry is full of successful startups with millions of dollars in available funding. Since legal financing between 2013 and 2017, this may be the perfect time to consider the potential of starting a legal financing company.

How Lawsuit Loans Work.

Lawsuit loans are an immediate cash payment to plaintiffs in exchange for a portion of their compensation when they settle or win their case. Basically, legal financing lenders purchase a portion of the settlement. In addition, lenders charge interest on top of the amount of money borrowed due to the high risk of their investment.

However, , lawsuit loans don’t require a credit check, income verification, or employment history. Lenders only approve funding based on the strength of the case, so if a plaintiff has a strong case that is 6-12 months away from a settlement, they are more likely to receive a loan, as described on pre settlement loan websites such as and others.

In addition, lawsuit loans are non-recourse, so the plaintiff doesn’t have to pay back the money they borrowed if they lose the case. The lender accepts the entirety of that risk.

Factors Contributing to the Growth of the Legal Financing Industry.

There are several reasons why legal financing continues to grow throughout the United States. A combination of lax regulations and an increase in personal injury cases contributes significantly to the industry’s growth and shows no signs of slowing down.

According to the New Yorker, the legal financing industry had more than $3 billion in assets in 2016. Another report by found that the number of lawyers in the United States who helped a client apply for a lawsuit loan quadrupled between 2013 and 2015, from 7% to 28%. While competition is hot, it’s clear that legal financing is increasing in demand.

Lack of Regulation.

Since legal financing is considered an investment or payment, it does not have the same federal and state regulations as traditional lending. In fact, most states don’t have any rules regarding legal funding since financing is non-recourse. This makes it easy for entrepreneurs to start legal financing businesses and obtain investors.

However, a few states have new regulations for lawsuit loans in place. For example, the with a lender after the state’s Supreme Court determined that legal financing was subject to Colorado’s Uniform Consumer Credit Code and that the amount of interest charged is predatory under Colorado lending laws.

More People are Filing Personal Injury Lawsuits.

While the number of civil cases filed in district courts continues to increase, personal injury claims have grown the most. 

According to an , the total number of personal injury lawsuits filed in a district court almost doubled between 1990 and 2019. In addition, the number of personal injury claims filed between 2018 and 2019 alone increased by more than 20%. In 2019, personal injury claims made up nearly one-third of all civil cases in the US. Most personal injury cases involved motor vehicle accidents, medical malpractice, defective pharmaceuticals, and marine injuries.

Lawsuit Loans Have a High Rate of Return if Successful.

Most lenders have interest rates ranging from , or 36-60% annually. Since lawsuits often take months or years to settle or receive a judgment, the rate of return for lenders is high. For example, if a lender allows a plaintiff to borrow $10,000 at an interest rate of 36% compounded monthly and the case settles in 6 months, the lender receives $10,000 plus an additional $1,800 in interest.

Lenders are Forming Trade Groups to Establish Ethical Guidelines.

Since there are so many legal financing companies operating and few federal regulations, some of the industry’s leading lenders decided to start a trade group called the , or ALFA. With more than 30 members, ALFA provides 90% of all legal financing in the United States.

Members of the organization have their own code of conduct with protections in place for consumers, including restrictions on overfunding, false advertising, and referral commissions. ALFA also supports new consumer protection regulations for the industry and highlights third-party research about legal financing. 

Personal Injury Lawsuits Have a High Value.

Since legal financing lenders need the strongest cases possible to make the risk worth their time, they typically fund personal injury cases where negligence plays a significant role. 

According to a survey conducted by Nolo, around 70% of personal injury plaintiffs receive a settlement or judgment. Out of all of the plaintiffs surveyed, half received a settlement or judgment worth $10,001 to more than $75,000. Most importantly, plaintiffs who retained a lawyer were more likely to win their case and received more than $75,000 on average. Plaintiffs without a lawyer received almost 80% less compensation as well.

This is the reason why most legal financing lenders require applicants to have a lawyer representing their case. Not only does it significantly reduce the risk of lending, but it also means a potentially higher return.

This is the Best Time to Consider a Legal Financing Startup.

Based on the increased popularity of lawsuit loans, lack of regulations, and high return on lawsuit investments, this is the best time to start a legal financing company. Investors and consumers are already taking notice of the benefits of legal financing, and as the number of civil cases continues to rise, so too will demand for lawsuit loans.

The post The New Startup: Legal Financing & Lawsuit Loans appeared first on Young Upstarts.

Source : Young Upstarts More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.