London Science Museum signed gagging order with Shell over climate change exhibition

Campaigners accuse museum of allowing Shell to 'greenwash' their image with exhibition on carbon capture.

London Science Museum signed gagging order with Shell over climate change exhibition

The London Science Museum agreed not to publicly criticize Shell as part of a sponsorship deal for an exhibition about carbon capture. 

In a contract released to campaign group Culture Unstained under freedom of information laws, the museum said it would not “make any statement or issue any publicity or otherwise be involved in any conduct or matter that may reasonably be foreseen as discrediting or damaging the goodwill or reputation of the Sponsor.”

The exhibition, called Our Future Planet, explores different natural and technological solutions for drawing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. These include technologies that Shell either has commercial interest in, researches or actually operates.

Oil and gas industry support for British cultural institutions has been subject to a long-running campaign by environmentalists. Culture Unstained accused the Science Museum of allowing Shell to “greenwash” its public image.

Culture Unstained also obtained email exchanges between museum director Ian Blatchford as he sought Shell’s help in securing support from the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative — a group of a dozen of the largest fossil fuel corporations. The Science Museum eventually walked away from the deal, the documents said, because one of the companies did not meet its environmental criteria. 

A Science Museum spokesperson told U.K. broadcaster Channel 4 News, which first reported the contract, that “energy companies need to play a big part” in the “transition to a low carbon economy” and that “we regard the blanket approach demanded by some campaigners of severing all relationships with energy companies as unproductive.”

A spokesperson for Shell said: “We fully respect the museum’s independence. That’s why its exhibition on carbon capture matters and why we supported it. Debate and discussion — among anyone who sees it — are essential.”

Source : Politico EU More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

Borrell: EU’s ‘insufficient’ vaccine donations open door for China

The EU hasn't fulfilled its commitments to Africa and Latin America, risking 'geopolitical consequences,' the foreign policy chief warns.

Borrell: EU’s ‘insufficient’ vaccine donations open door for China

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on Friday lambasted the bloc’s “insufficient” coronavirus vaccine shipments to Africa and Latin America, warning that Europe risks losing influence to China.

The remarks reflect a growing concern in the EU that the bloc is not living up to its promises toward Africa and Latin America — both in terms of fighting the pandemic as well as building trade links — while China is sending more vaccines, making big investments and expanding its influence in these regions.

“China’s expansion in Africa and Latin America should concern us and should occupy us a great deal,” Borrell told a summer course organized by the Menéndez Pelayo International University in Santander, Spain. “In Europe, we vaccinated 60 percent of our population, in Africa, they are at 2 or 3 percent. Who’s the big vaccine supplier to Africa? China. Who’s the big vaccine supplier to Latin America? China.”

Indeed, China has been stepping up its vaccine diplomacy in developing countries. Earlier this month, President Xi Jinping pledged $3 billion in pandemic aid for poorer countries. Xi also claimed China had provided 500 million vaccine doses to developing countries. 

Borrell compared that to the vows made by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who pledged 200 million doses to low- and middle-income countries by the end of the year.

“Yes, but when?” Borrell said. “The problem isn’t just the commitment but the effectiveness.”

According to the latest figures he had seen, Borrell said Europeans had distributed “around 10 million doses in Africa for a continent with 1.5 billion inhabitants. It’s certainly insufficient.”

The EU foreign policy representative recalled that von der Leyen launched her “geopolitical Commission” in 2019 by traveling to Africa and promising close partnership and cooperation. Those promises have now been thrown into doubt, he warned.

“We’re doing a lot but this lot isn’t enough,” he said. “An African leader recently told me: ‘You told us you would be our best partners. Well, now you have the chance to prove it.’”

The Chinese media has homed in on this point, portraying China as the most helpful partner for the developing world, while dismissing EU and U.S. efforts as negligible.

Borrell admitted the narrative is a major problem. “Others are doing more than us, or at least people perceive that they are doing more than us,” he said. “And that will have geopolitical consequences. Europe has to speed up … the putting into practice of our commitments.”

He also acknowledged that the EU has a problem with the visibility of its vaccine donations, despite being closely involved in COVAX, the global vaccine distribution initiative.

“We’ve given a lot of money to COVAX, we’re the great funders of COVAX,” he said. “But COVAX doesn’t appear as Europe, it’s an intermediate entity that has had enormous difficulties in supplying vaccines in the necessary amount.”

The Commission has similarly raised concerns about a lack of visibility for donations, especially when compared to the media blitzes that China and Russia launch when they offer supplies. The Commission wrote in the spring that it wanted to increase the awareness of its exports and donations by slapping EU and national flags on packages and allowing countries to donate to specific, strategically important regions.

The EU did eventually make a big public splash when it announced the 200 million dose donation. But the grand rhetoric has not yet been met with follow-up action. A Commission document seen by POLITICO showed that, as of July 14, only 4 percent of around 150 million vaccines that countries promised to donate had been delivered.

While the EU has exported many millions of doses around the world, the biggest recipients of those shots are wealthy countries like Japan and Canada.

Borrell said his concerns about slow EU action and Chinese expansion were not only linked to the area of vaccine distribution but also to trade deals.

“It is hard to understand why Europe is having so many delays in approving the association agreements with Mexico and Chile, while China is landing in all parts of Latin America and occupying a predominant role,” he warned, referencing two pending EU trade and political cooperation deals.

He added: “We should be much more diligent — and Latin America tells us: ‘Hey, if you are so concerned and want to be such partners with us, then please sign these agreements, because in the meantime China is landing.’”

Jillian Deutsch and Stuart Lau contributed reporting.

Source : Politico EU More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.