Tokyo’s Olympic Games: A Reporter Looks Back

This year's games will go ahead, though spectators will be barred from most events amid concerns over COVID-19.

Tokyo’s Olympic Games: A Reporter Looks Back

As the Olympic Games open in Tokyo under stressful conditions, it’s hard to remember how upbeat its citizens were 57 years ago when the city first hosted the games.

I was a fledgling journalist working the night desk for the UPI news agency at the time, so I didn’t get to attend the games but I did witness the excitement over the Olympics that many Japanese felt at the time.

As three New York Times reporters explained it in the newspaper’s July 22 edition, “the 1964 Tokyo Olympics are often regarded as the point when Japan pivoted into prosperity.”

Within four years, Japan became the world’s second-largest economy, behind the United States, which had occupied the country at the end of the Second World War.

You could sense the excitement over the Olympics in the streets of Tokyo. The Japanese government initiated a building binge aimed at making the city more presentable.

For the first time in their lives, many Japanese bought television sets and other modern appliances like refrigerators.

“Back in 1964, there was “a sense of Japan in motion and a sense of a country with a future,’ Hiromu Nagahara, an associate professor of history at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told The Times.

Now, it’s “a country that has lost confidence and a country whose political elites feel very intensely that loss of confidence,” Nagahara said.

The dangers posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have caused many Japanese to oppose holding the Olympics In Tokyo.

When Tokyo bid for holding the games, the Japanese Prime Minister at the time, Shinzo Abe, described it as a symbol of triumph over a devastating earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear accident that occurred in 2011.

That message has been lost as the games are now being held amid a state of emergency as coronavirus cases have reached a six-month high in Tokyo.

Positive cases have been discovered in the Olympic Village, and spectators will be barred from all but a few events. So most Japanese will be watching on television.

A few scandals involving organizers of the Olympics have further clouded the picture.

Games will go on

But the decision has been made. The games will go on. And once they begin, attention and excitement will likely shift to the athletes themselves, some of whom have spoken enthusiastically to broadcasters about the well-organized accommodations they have been provided at the Olympic Village

In an interview on Tuesday with The Wall Street Journal, Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga defended his decision to hold the Tokyo Olympics during a pandemic, saying that Japan has a fraction of the COVID-19 cases that Western countries have experienced.

He also said that Japan has been more disciplined in preventing infections.

“If you compare our number of infections with countries abroad, we have fewer by a whole order of magnitude,” Suga said. “We’ve got vaccinations advancing, we’re taking tough steps to prevent infections, so my judgment is we’re in the right place and we’re ready to go.”

Mask-wearing remains nearly universal in Japan, which Suga said is crucial to protecting the nation.

According to The Journal, infections in Tokyo started rising in late June, leading Suga to declare a state of emergency in the capital starting July 12 and lasting through the end of the Olympics.

Japan’s daily infections—nearly 4,000 on July 20—are running at about one-fourth the U.S. level on a per-capita basis.

With three in five elderly people and 22 percent of the overall population now fully vaccinated, the death toll in Japan also has rapidly shrunk to about one-seventh the U.S. level per capita, according to Our World in Data, a website that tracks COVID-19 cases.

Source : Radio Free Asia More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

China Claims Progress in Anti-Inflation Campaign

Price control tactics raise policy concerns.

China Claims Progress in Anti-Inflation Campaign

China has claimed an early victory in its battle against inflation, but the government's tactics and economic policies have left the outcome in doubt.

On July 9, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reported that the producer price index (PPI) for June rose 8.8 percent from a year earlier, dropping back slightly from a 12-year high of 9 percent in May.

As factory gate prices decelerated, the year-to-year growth of the consumer price index (CPI) also subsided, edging down to 1.1 percent in June from 1.3 percent a month before, the NBS said.

Officials said the numbers were a sign that inflationary pressures were under control and would not pose a threat to economic growth.

"China's economy recovered steadily in June, with ample supply in the consumer market and the stable performance of consumer prices," said NBS senior statistician Dong Lijuan, according to the official Xinhua news agency.

Some foreign media also credited the government with pushing back against the surge in commodities which has driven up prices for inputs including crude oil, natural gas, iron ore and coal this year.

"If the goal of Beijing's efforts to tame the commodities rally was to halt an escalation in manufacturing costs, the government can claim some initial success," Bloomberg News said, citing a retreat in spot prices for copper and steel coils during June.

"While the precise impact of Beijing's high-profile, multi-pronged campaign to batter down commodities prices is arguable, the implications of softer prices are becoming clear. A less frenzied commodities market and peak inflation give authorities more policy space to tackle rising pressures on the economy," Bloomberg said on July 8.

But a closer look at the economic tactics that the government brought to bear against inflation raised doubts about the real cost of marginal gains.

An examination of the economic decision-making and statistical reporting suggests that the government used a combination of crude tools and coercive policies to keep inflation from spilling over from factory gate prices into the consumer sector, resulting in only a slight pullback in price growth from the highs of May.

CPI readings continued to benefit from falling prices of pork as farmers dumped underweight hogs on the market due to fears of African swine fever outbreaks.

On June 16, China's National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration announced that it would release some of its stores of nonferrous metals to stabilize prices for the first time in over a decade.

On July 5, the authorities sold 100,000 metric tons of copper, aluminum and zinc at auction for undisclosed prices, said to be below spot market rates. The offerings were quickly snapped up, Reuters reported.

On Wednesday, the regulators announced a second auction of the metals totaling 170,000 tons would take place by the end of this month along with more efforts to stabilize prices.

The government does not publicize the size of its reserves, making it difficult to evaluate its ability to continue the releases or the longer-term effects on the markets.

Fluctuation

China's top planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), said that regulators would sell metal reserves "in multiple batches as needed in light of market price changes," Xinhua reported.

On July 19, the NDRC said it would "closely monitor" price changes and futures trading to "maintain market order," and crack down on violations such as hoarding, according to the official English-language China Daily.

Days earlier, the agency said it would release more than 10 million tons of coal from state reserves for the fifth time this year to meet peak summer demand and ease shortages, Reuters reported.

Last month, the commission also issued new rules for publishers of commodity indexes in an apparent effort to discourage the reporting of price increases and inventory levels.

"According to the regulation, authorities can conduct compliance reviews and take disciplinary measures for non- compliance," the NDRC said.

The emergence of price controls follows uncertainty about the uneven pace of economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.

While the government has spurred industrial production, helping to drive up raw material prices, retail sales growth has remained relatively restrained.

Despite the argument that a cooling off of commodities would give the government more room to deal with pressures on the economy, the price control tactics are essentially pulling in the opposite direction from China's pro-growth campaign.

"As in the U.S., the Chinese authorities want to talk of 'transitory' price spikes and wish inflation away while pursuing aggressive stimulation," said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

"My guess is that, by the first quarter of 2022, the contradictions will become too obvious to ignore," Hufbauer said.

Recovery

In recent weeks, China has unveiled a series of measures to keep economic growth on the recovery track despite sporadic outbreaks of the virus around the country and the threat of variants abroad.

In June, China's banks boosted loans by 17 percent from a year before to 2.12 trillion yuan (U.S. $327.7 billion), according to People's Bank of China (PBOC) figures.

On July 9, the PBOC announced it would cut the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for most banks by one-half of a percentage point, adding 1 trillion yuan (U.S. $154 billion) of liquidity to the economy.

One day earlier, the PBOC said it would remove 24 billion yuan (U.S. $3.7 billion) in transaction fees to help small and micro-sized enterprises, Xinhua reported.

Taken together, the measures stop short of a major stimulus, but the effect is likely to support increased consumption and raw material demand.

While China has been battling back against commodity price hikes and inflation, it has also claimed credit for the effect on first-half trade figures, which exceeded forecasts.

Last week, China's General Administration of Customs (GAC) reported that total trade jumped 27.1 percent in the first half to 18.07 trillion yuan (U.S. $2.79 trillion).

Exports in June climbed 32.2 percent from a year earlier in dollar terms, beating a Reuters forecast of 23.1 percent. Imports climbed 36.7 percent, topping the forecast of 30 percent.

"The surprise surge in exports is probably in large part due to rising commodity prices, as commodities like iron ore soared and price pressures passed on from imports to exports," said Zhou Hao, senior economist for emerging markets at Commerzbank AG, quoted by Bloomberg.

In releasing the trade results, the GAC portrayed inflation as a product not of China's making, despite the effects of China's economic growth and demand.

"The risks of imported inflation are generally controllable in China, though the rise in international bulk commodity prices has pushed up the production costs of enterprises," the GAC said, according to Xinhua.

The positive trade numbers set the stage for China's larger release of economic growth data last week.

In announcing the 7.9-percent growth of gross domestic product in the second quarter, the NBS and state media took pains to highlight the 12.7-percent growth rate of the first half in an attempt to minimize the drop from the record first-quarter rate of 18.3 percent.

Growth rates for trade and GDP are expected to keep declining throughout the year, but the Communist Party tabloid Global Times argued that the signs of slower growth in the second half are "not (a) cause for concern."

The paper quoted a GAC official as warning of the risk of a trade slowdown for reasons beyond China's control.

"At the moment, the COVID-19 epidemic is still spreading in many places around the globe, the trend of the epidemic is complex and trade still faces many uncertain and unstable factors," the official said.

Source : Radio Free Asia More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.