UK to issue short-term visas to help ease trucker, food industry shortages

Visas to be issued for truck drivers and poultry workers in the run-up to Christmas.

UK to issue short-term visas to help ease trucker, food industry shortages

The United Kingdom will grant temporary visas in an effort to tackle supply chain woes, the government said late Saturday. 

“5,000 HGV drivers will be able to come to the UK for 3 months in the run-up to Christmas, providing short-term relief for the haulage industry,” it said in a statement.

“A further 5,500 visas for poultry workers will also be made available for the same short period, to avoid any potential further pressures on the food industry during this exceptional period,” it added.

Britain has been facing an acute shortage of HGV drivers in recent months, with industry blaming a combination of Brexit’s restrictions on labor mobility and a backlog of driver tests as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Some business groups have already raised concerns that the latest measures are insufficient. 

“Now some action has been taken, but additional testing will take time and the low number of visas offered is insufficient,” Ruby McGregor-Smith, president of the British Chambers of Commerce, said in a statement. 

“Even if these short-term opportunities attract the maximum amount of people allowed under the scheme, it will not be enough to address the scale of the problem that has now developed in our supply chains,” she said, adding: “This announcement is the equivalent of throwing a thimble of water on a bonfire.” 

McGregor-Smith warned that, without further action, Britain faces “the very real prospect of serious damage to our economic recovery, stifled growth as well as another less than happy Christmas for many businesses and their customers across the country.”

Ian Wright, chief executive of the Food and Drink Federation, welcomed the government’s visa decision while also warning that more action will be needed in the long run. 

“This is a start but we need the government to continue to collaborate with industry and seek additional long term solutions,” he said.

The British authorities will also invest in courses with the aim of training up to 4,000 new drivers, while the Ministry of Defence will deploy staff to help boost testing capacity for drivers. Letters will be sent to individuals already holding licenses to drive lorries, encouraging those who left the industry to return.

Keir Starmer, leader of the opposition Labour Party, accused ministers of “a complete lack of planning” for labor shortages in the wake of the 2016 Brexit vote.

“We took the decision to leave the EU in 2016, so we’ve had five years for the government to work through the consequences,” he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show. “And here we are on a Sunday morning with petrol stations closed or massive queues, with supermarkets that have got shelves that are empty — a total lack of planning and a prime minister who cannot take any decisions.”

Speaking on the same show, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps argued Brexit allows ministers “the flexibility to set our own rules” and issue visas where needed to tackle shortages.

“On the other side of Brexit, it’s actually given me a lot of freedom to get on with expanding the number of [driving] tests available, which is the real constriction here,” he argued.

“Those are changes that I couldn’t have made if we were still in Europe, because of the way that the licenses operated were all set by European directives — so we’ve benefited from some of those extra freedoms,” Shapps said.

Want more analysis from POLITICO? POLITICO Pro is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From financial services to trade, technology, cybersecurity and more, Pro delivers real time intelligence, deep insight and breaking scoops you need to keep one step ahead. Email pro@politico.eu to request a complimentary trial.
Source : Politico EU More   

What's Your Reaction?

like
0
dislike
0
love
0
funny
0
angry
0
sad
0
wow
0

Next Article

Achtung! The über-Bundestag is coming

A handy guide to how Germans will pick a (big) parliament and a chancellor.

Achtung! The über-Bundestag is coming

BERLIN — We may not yet know the identity of Germany’s next chancellor, but it’s almost certain that they’ll be elected by a parliament that’s even bigger than today’s.

Germany isn’t getting any larger, but the peculiarities of its voting system mean that the number of members of the Bundestag fluctuates.

German voters cast two ballots, one for a candidate in their local constituency and a second for a party. If a party wins more seats via the former than the latter, a process is triggered whereby it gets to keep those seats and other parties are compensated for the imbalance this creates.

Confused? You’re not alone. The system is so arcane that few Germans understand the mechanics. But politicians can’t agree on a fundamental reform because no one wants to risk losing seats, even though the parliament expanded to a record 709 seats at the last election. They tried last year, but the changes will do little to halt the Bundestag’s bulge.

“Based on current polls, my prediction is that the next Bundestag will have 860 seats,” said Christian Hesse, a mathematics professor at the University of Stuttgart who has been involved in the quarrel over a reformed electoral law for years.

Hesse’s estimate is not the most extreme scenario among those currently circulating in German media, but it would still mean 151 seats more than the current total.

“The prescribed size of parliament is actually only 598, that is the number of constituencies — 299 — multiplied by two,” continued Hesse.

But if a party wins more direct candidates via the first vote than it would be eligible to have via the second vote, it has a right to so-called “overhang seats,” which then have to be compensated through so-called “leveling seats,” so other parties aren’t put at a disadvantage.

At the last election, 65 overhang seats and 46 leveling seats were added to the Bundestag.

Splitting the vote

The whole system was relatively manageable for much of Germany’s postwar history, when there were only a few parties in parliament. But things have been thrown out of whack as more parties have entered parliament and more voters have cast their first and second ballots for different parties.

“Due to the increasing pluralization of the party system, it’s becoming more and more fragmented and majorities are becoming smaller, which increases the risk of overhang and leveling seats also because more and more people split their votes,” said Robert Vehrkamp, director of the Future of Democracy program at the Bertelsmann Foundation, a think tank.

At this election, many observers say a perfect storm is brewing over the Bundestag.

One reason is that many right-of-center voters may split their votes — for example, supporting a local candidate from the CDU/CSU conservative alliance but casting their list vote for the liberal Free Democrats (FDP).

“One of the biggest risks is that the CDU/CSU will win many direct seats while at the same time performing poorly on second votes,” Vehrkamp said.

Vehrkamp said he’s not particularly bothered by the money the additional lawmakers will cost the taxpayer, since “democracy is allowed to cost money,” but that too many seats will make parliament dysfunctional.

“Twenty years ago, a Bundestag commission found that a suitable parliamentary size for Germany would be a maximum of 600 based among other things on the workflow and how big individual committees would be,” Vehrkamp said, adding: “A parliament with 800 delegates works worse than a parliament with 600 delegates — and we’re already at 709.”

GERMANY NATIONAL PARLIAMENT ELECTION POLL OF POLLS



For more polling data from across Europe visit Poll of Polls.

Choosing a chancellor

Surprisingly, while the election process oozes German meticulousness, the path to a new chancellor after an election is set out rather loosely.

On Sunday, German voters won’t directly choose a successor to Angela Merkel, who is not running for reelection after 16 years in power.

They’ll elect a parliament that will, in turn, elect a chancellor once parties have agreed on a government.

There’s no process laid down in the constitution for forming a coalition and the president does not have to give any party a mandate to try to build an alliance. It’s up to the parties themselves to figure that out.

Only once coalition negotiations are completed does the president come forward to propose a candidate for chancellor.

“Before that, it’s not a legal but a political question to what extent individual parties want to enter into coalition negotiations,” said Dana-Sophia Valentiner, professor of public law at the Justus Liebig University in Gießen.

Coalition talks will be exceedingly difficult this time, as it is almost certain three parties — rather than the usual two — will be necessary to form a majority coalition. In theory, a minority government is possible but the inherent instability it brings makes one unlikely.

If a chancellor candidate does not garner the necessary majority within three ballots, the president must decide either to appoint the chancellor of a minority government or to dissolve the Bundestag, triggering a new election.

In a country that prizes orderly process, that would be what Germans call a SuperGAU — a total meltdown.

Source : Politico EU More   

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.